вт, 5 янв. 2021 г. в 07:26, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com>:
> This situation makes me feel that I'm inclined to skip the back-patch to > v9.5. > Because the next minor version release is the final one for v9.5. So if we > unexpectedly introduce the bug to v9.5 by the back-patch, there is no > chance to fix that. OTOH, of course, if we don't do the back-patch, there > is > no chance to fix the deadlock detection bug since the final minor version > for v9.5 doesn't include that bug fix. But I'm afraid that the back-patch > to v9.5 may give more risk than gain. > > Thought? > Honestly, I was thinking that this will not be backpatched at all and really am glad we're getting this fixed in the back branches as well. Therefore I think it's fine to skip 9.5, though I would've mentioned this in the commit message. -- Victor Yegorov
