On 2021-Jan-20, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > My proposal is to make everything after the ** operator use strict mode > (patch attached). I think this shouldn't be backpatched, just applied to > the v14. Other suggestions?
I think changing the mode midway through the operation is strange. What do you think of requiring for ** that mode is strict? That is, if ** is used and the mode is lax, an error is thrown. Thanks -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
