Hi, Alvaro! Thank you for your feedback.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:16 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2021-Jan-20, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > My proposal is to make everything after the ** operator use strict mode > > (patch attached). I think this shouldn't be backpatched, just applied to > > the v14. Other suggestions? > > I think changing the mode midway through the operation is strange. What > do you think of requiring for ** that mode is strict? That is, if ** is > used and the mode is lax, an error is thrown. Yes, changing mode in midway is a bit strange. Requiring strict mode for ** is a solution, but probably too restrictive... What do you think about making just subsequent accessor after ** not to unwrap arrays. That would be a bit tricky to implement, but probably that would better satisfy the user needs. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
