At Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:10:24 +0530, vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote in
> Attached v5 patch has the fixes for the same.
PMSIGNAL_BACKTRACE_EMIT is not used anywhere?
(the commit message seems stale.)
+++ b/src/bin/pg_ctl/t/005_backtrace.pl
pg_ctl doesn't (or no longer?) seem relevant to this patch.
+ eval {
+ $current_logfiles = slurp_file($node->data_dir .
'/current_logfiles');
+ };
+ last unless $@;
Is there any reason not just to do "while (! -e <filenmae)) { usleep(); }" ?
+logging_collector = on
I don't see a reason for turning on logging collector here.
+gdb ./postgres
+GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-115.el7
+Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
<literal><</literal>http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html<literal>></literal>
+This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
+There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
+and "show warranty" for details.
+This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
+For bug reporting instructions, please see:
+<literal><</literal>http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/<literal>></literal>...
+Reading symbols from /home/postgresdba/inst/bin/postgres...done.
Almost all of the banner lines seem to be useless here.
#define SIGNAL_BACKEND_SUCCESS 0
+#define BACKEND_VALIDATION_SUCCESS 0
#define SIGNAL_BACKEND_ERROR 1
#define SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION 2
#define SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOSUPERUSER 3
Even though I can share the feeling that SIGNAL_BACKEND_SUCCESS is a
bit odd to represent "sending signal is allowed", I feel that it's
better using the existing symbol than using the new symbol.
+validate_backend_pid(int pid)
The function needs a comment. The name is somewhat
confusing. check_privilege_to_send_singal()?
Maybe the return value of the function should be changed to an enum,
and its callers should use switch-case to handle the value.
+ if (!SendProcSignal(bt_pid, PROCSIG_BACKTRACE_PRINT,
InvalidBackendId))
+ PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
+ else
+ ereport(WARNING,
+ (errmsg("failed to send signal
to postmaster: %m")));
+ }
+
+ PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
The variable "result" seems useless.
+ elog(LOG_SERVER_ONLY, "current backtrace:%s", errtrace.data);
+
+ errno = save_errno;
+}
You need to release the resouces held by the errtrace. And the
errtrace is a bit pointless. Why isn't it "backtrace"?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
