> On Apr 19, 2021, at 10:50 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <j...@dalibo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The community needs a single shared PostgresNode implementation that can be
>> used by scripts which reproduce bugs.
>
> Which means it could be OK to have a PostgresNode implementation, leaving in
> core source-tree, which supports broader needs than the core ones (older
> versions and some more methods)? Did I understood correctly?
Yes, I believe it should be in core.
I don't know about "some more methods", as it depends which methods you are
proposing.
> If this is correct, I suppose this effort could be committed early in v15
> cycle?
I don't care to speculate on that yet.
> Does it deserve some effort to build some dedicated TAP tests for these
> modules? I already have a small patch for this waiting on my disk for some
> more
> tests and review...
I did that, too, in the 0002 version of my patch. Perhaps we need to merge
your work and mine.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
