On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 09:39, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > I suspect "an historic" is bordering on archaic even in the UK these days.
Yeah, that's a weird one. Maybe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-dropping is to blame. David
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" Dave Page
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" Daniel Gustafsson
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"... David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL&... David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a... Isaac Morland
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Gavin Flower
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Isaac Morland
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Gavin Flower
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Tom Lane
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: "an SQL" vs. &qu... David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" Roberto Mello
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" Alvaro Herrera
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" Tom Lane
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"... Tom Lane
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL&... David Rowley
- Re: "an SQL" vs. "a... Tom Lane
