Le lun. 26 juil. 2021 à 00:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:03:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Would it be worth to split the query for the prepared statement row vs > the rest > > to keep the full "plans" coverage when possible? > > +1, the same thought occurred to me later. Also, if we're making > it specific to the one PREPARE example, we could get away with > checking "plans >= 2 AND plans <= calls", with a comment like > "we expect at least one replan event, but there could be more". > Do you want to prepare a patch? > Sure, I will work on that tomorrow! >