Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 7/25/21 12:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So AFAICS this test is inherently unstable and there is no code bug
>> to be fixed. We could drop the "plans" column from this query, or
>> print something approximate like "plans > 0 AND plans <= calls".
>> Thoughts?
> Is that likely to tell us anything very useful?
The variant suggested downthread ("plans >= 2 AND plans <= calls" for the
PREPARE entry only) seems like it's still reasonably useful. At least it
can verify that a replan has occurred and been counted.
regards, tom lane
