On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:55:35AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > In the view of that, how about doubling PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL to 1000 > milliseconds? That would mean slightly less up-to-date statistics, but > I doubt that that will be a problem. And it should even out the increase > in statistics messages, except in the case of lots of short-lived > sessions. But in that scenario you cannot have session statistics > without lots of extra messages, and such a workload has enough performance > problems as it is, so I don't think we have to specifically worry about it.
Perhaps we could do that. Now, increasing an interval for the sake of balancing the extra load created by a feature while impacting the whole set of stats is not really appealing. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
