On Wed, 2021-09-01 at 10:33 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:55:35AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > In the view of that, how about doubling PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL to 1000 > > milliseconds? > > Perhaps we could do that. Now, increasing an interval for the sake of > balancing the extra load created by a feature while impacting the > whole set of stats is not really appealing.
I agree. But if the best fix is too invasive at this point, the alternatives are reverting the patch or choosing a less appealing solution. Yours, Laurenz Albe
