> I don't know from your post if you thought I was adding
> to the criticism or not, but I can say with certainty I wasn't.
No, I saw that you understood perfectly, I just wanted to add another
two cents...
> I'm not denigrating the current efforts, because PG documention's pretty
> good all things considered. But some volunteers devoted to improving
> the docs could accomplish a lot.
Yup. Anyone out there with the time and interest?
regards, tom lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Don Baccus
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Christopher Kings-Lynne
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recove... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash duri... Robert B. Easter
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash ... Thomas Lockhart
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during W... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash duri... Thomas Lockhart
- postgres docs (was Re: [HACK... Norman Clarke
- Re: postgres docs (was R... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL re... Hannu Krosing
- RE: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery? Mitch Vincent
