> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am I handling this properly? I hate to be dragging around the unix
> > socket directory name in pghost for too long and hate to be propogating
> > the slash test throughout the code.
>
> It's probably cleanest to do that the way you are doing it. However,
> one could argue we should make PQhost() return
> pghost ? pghost : pgunixsocket
> which'd make the external behavior compatible with the way one specifies
> the connection.
>
> Basically, the idea was to *not* have a distinct unixsocket spec
> anywhere in libpq's external API, so that existing apps wouldn't need
> a rewrite to support this feature. Keeping unixsocket separate inside
> the library is a good idea, but it's independent of the API.
Done. New code:
return conn->pghost ? conn->pghost : conn->pgunixsocket;
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
