Re: [HACKERS] location of Unix socket

[Tom Lane]

Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm going to disable the URL patch, since it doesn't seem to work and
> breaks legitimate uses of database names with funny characters.  The
> service patch seemed kind of useful, but since it's not documented and I
> don't feel like finding out, I think we can let it go the SSL way, i.e.,
> sort out for next release.

Sounds like a plan.  The service patch at least doesn't look like it
will cause surprises for anyone who doesn't know about it ...

                        regards, tom lane