Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another thing we should think about is to not tar.gz the documentation
> files. That way we could create useful incremental diffs between releases
> later on. Any comments here?
I've never figured out why we do that. Since the thing is going to be
inside a tarball anyway, there's no possible savings from distributing
the built doco that way, rather than as ordinary files.
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, fina... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?) Joel Burton
