> Is there any prospect of making the output filenames more predictable? > Who should I annoy about it? Well, you could annoy me about it... ... and I would go to my local installation of the source tree... ... and build the docs to confirm that the *chapters* have good predictable names... ... and find the *every* .htm file has a "good" name. Hmm. Is it the fact that someone went through and added an "id field" to every chapter and section header? Whoever it was, good job! It wasn't me, but whoever it was: good job :) Ah, a perusal of the cvs log shows that Peter E. is the culprit. Looks like it is a non-issue from here on. - Thomas
- [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, fina... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packa... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...p... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 ...packaged, finally ... Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?) Joel Burton
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1 beta 1 (ODBC driver?... The Hermit Hacker