On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:32:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > worst case, we pull it out afterwards ... > > No, worst case is that we release a seriously broken 7.1, and don't > find out till afterwards. > > There are plenty of new features on my to-do list, if beta no longer > means anything... Does this mean the code gets put in contrib/, with a prominent pointer in the release notes? Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Alfred Perlstein