Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did we decide against LAZY?
I thought the core consensus was that it was too risky to install
post-beta. On the other hand, we're installing some other pretty
major fixes. Do we want to re-open that discussion?
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches w... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patc... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacuum f... Andrew Snow
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] (one more time) Patches with vacu... Alfred Perlstein
