Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> seems rtree doesn't ignore NULL ?
Hm, maybe not. There are explicit tests to ignore null inputs in hash
indexes (hash/hash.c), and I'd just sort of assumed that rtree and gist
do the same.
FWIW, your example doesn't seem to provoke an error in current sources;
but it does take quite a long time (far longer than building a btree
index on 10000 nulls). That makes me think that indexing nulls in rtree
might be a bad idea even if it works.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST c... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST c... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
