Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > seems rtree doesn't ignore NULL ? Hm, maybe not. There are explicit tests to ignore null inputs in hash indexes (hash/hash.c), and I'd just sort of assumed that rtree and gist do the same. FWIW, your example doesn't seem to provoke an error in current sources; but it does take quite a long time (far longer than building a btree index on 10000 nulls). That makes me think that indexing nulls in rtree might be a bad idea even if it works. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST c... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST c... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of Gi... Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov