Re: [HACKERS] Who is a maintainer of GiST code ?

[Hannu Krosing]

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > seems rtree doesn't ignore NULL ?
> 
> Hm, maybe not.  There are explicit tests to ignore null inputs in hash
> indexes (hash/hash.c), and I'd just sort of assumed that rtree and gist
> do the same.
> 
> FWIW, your example doesn't seem to provoke an error in current sources;
> but it does take quite a long time (far longer than building a btree
> index on 10000 nulls).  That makes me think that indexing nulls in rtree
> might be a bad idea even if it works.

Or maybe just some optimisations done for large number of similar keys (
probabilistic page-splitting or some such ;) in btree are not done in
rtree ?

----------
Hannu