On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Nathan Myers wrote:
> The code is based on some odd assumptions. A select() with 0 delay
> returns immediately unless there is an interrupt during its (very short!)
If you look closely, it's a select with a 2 second timeout.
>>> { 2, 0 }
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/ http://www.the-infinite.org/~dominic/
- [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first tim... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed the ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will ... Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TA... Alfred Perlstein
- RE: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed the ... Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed ... Nathan Myers
- RE: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed the ... Mikheev, Vadim
