RE: [HACKERS] Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten

[Mikheev, Vadim]

> > Actually, one slocks are held
> > longer than anothers - probably we should use different delays...
> 
> I don't understand the last remark.  Are you proposing to mix some 
> random numbers into the delays?

No, use different s_spincycle-s for different slocks.

Vadim