The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Namely, should we bundle up a beta4 this weeekend, so that the GiST > changes are in place for further testing, or hold off for ... ? First I'd like to finish a couple of open items I have, like fixing the CRIT_SECTION code so that SIGTERM response will not occur when we are holding a spinlock. Should be able to get this stuff done in a day or two, if I quit arguing about GIST and get back to work... regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] R-Tree implement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Tom Lane
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker