On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Namely, should we bundle up a beta4 this weeekend, so that the GiST > > changes are in place for further testing, or hold off for ... ? > > First I'd like to finish a couple of open items I have, like fixing > the CRIT_SECTION code so that SIGTERM response will not occur when > we are holding a spinlock. Should be able to get this stuff done in > a day or two, if I quit arguing about GIST and get back to work... Okay, let's scheduale for Monday then if we can ... unless someone comes across something major like we did with the whole beta2/beta3 release :)
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] R-Tree implement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Tom Lane
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker