bpalmer wrote: > > On older versions of PG, 7.0 included, in the $PDGATA/base folder you > could see the names of the databases for that $PGDATA. Now all I see is: No longer. > Is there a way to relate this to the names of the databases? Why the > change? Or am I missing something key here.. See the thread on the renaming in the archives. In short, this is part of Vadim's work on WAL -- the new naming makes certain things easier for WAL. Utilities to relate the new names to the actual database/table names _do_ need to be written, however. The information exists in one of the system catalogs now -- it just has to be made accessible. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop