Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is. 7.1 builds cleanly on PPC without any CFLAGS hackery. I think >> we can even survive the -fsigned-char stupidity now ;-) > Oh, good. Makes it much cleaner. Care to test that theory? :-) I already did, I believe, but just in plain builds from source. Let me know when you think the 7.1 RPM specfile is stable enough to be worth testing, and I'll try to build PPC RPMs. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop