Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond Eivind Glomsrød writes: > > > > We don't use libtool. > > > > Doing so would be a good thing. > > Not if our code is more portable than libtool's. And this is the case? libtool covers pretty much everything... and you don't need to use it for every target. > > > Nor does libtool care about the processor. > > > > As you can see from the actual code segment, only the > > config.{guess,sub} files are copied. > > But you argued that this is because your config.guess supports s390 and > ia64 (which ours does as well) It may do so now, but I'm pretty sure it hasn't always done so... and even if it does, it doesn't hurt. > -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
- [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Oliver Elphick
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen