Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are you sure about 'ps' stuff portability?
> I am not going to do a huge amount with the actual ps columns, except
> allow you to sort on them. I will do most on the ps status display we
> use as the command line in ps.
... which in itself is not necessarily portable. How many of our
supported platforms actually have working ps-status code? (This is
an honest question: I don't know.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Richard J Kuhns
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Gordon A. Runkle
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor Gunnar R|nning
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor Karl DeBisschop
