> Bruce Momjian writes:
> ...
> > The problem I see with the shared memory idea is that some of the
> > information needed may be quite large. For example, query strings can
> > be very long. Do we just allocate 512 bytes and clip off the rest. And
> > as I add more info, I need more shared memory per backend. I just liked
> > the file system dump solution because I could modify it pretty easily,
> > and because the info only appears when you click on the process, it
> > doesn't happen often.
> >
> Have you thought about using a named pipe? They've been around for quite a
> while, and should (he said with a :-)) be available on most-if-not-all
> currently supported systems.
Nifty idea.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
