Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
>> depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
>> 8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
> Sure enough:
> - Macro: AC_FUNC_MEMCMP
> If the `memcmp' function is not available, or does not work on
> 8-bit data (like the one on SunOS 4.1.3), add `memcmp.o' to output
> variable `LIBOBJS'.
> We could try to mangle this into doing the right thing for us.
Not sure if it's worth the trouble. That would be an AC_TRY_RUN test,
which you've been trying to move away from, no? It doesn't seem like
anyone still cares about SunOS 4.1.*, so ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Henry B. Hotz
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Alexander Klimov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Doug McNaught
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
