> >> Suddenly I obtain access to
> >> ULTRIX black 4.3 1 RISC
> > Uh ... what kind of processor is that? Offhand I don't see any
> > indication that any of the entries in s_lock.h are supposed to work
> > for Ultrix.
As mentioned earlier, Ultrix on RISC means that it is a MIPS processor.
DEC implemented OSF-1 for their Alpha processors.
> I suspect that some one of the implementations in s_lock.h was intended
> to be usable on Ultrix, and we've somehow dropped the declarations
> needed to make it go. You might want to pull down an old tarball (6.3
> or before) and look at how it compiles the s_lock support on Ultrix.
Any hints for Alexander on how to do it *if* it is a MIPS processor?
- Thomas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Alexander Klimov
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Doug McNaught
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platform... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Mathijs Brands
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for... Tom Lane
- Regression test on FBSD 3.... Mathijs Brands
- Re: Regression test on FBS... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Regression t... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: Regression test on FBS... Peter Eisentraut
