> Do you know whether anyone uses the GNU assembler on this platform,
> or is it always SGI's? I'm wondering if we need two versions of the
> assembly code ...
Sure. Both compilers are available, with SGI's, uh, unique approach, and
with GNU's well understood assembler.
> I had missed the fact that s_lock.c contains some MIPS code. Anyone
> have any idea what versions of the MIPS series this code runs on?
There is a chance it is from the Ultrix days (very pre-1998 afaicr). Or
is it the *only* MIPS code in our tree? If so, then it probably supports
Tatsuo's dead Cobalt server box, which is fairly recent vintage.
- Thomas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platform... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Mathijs Brands
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Tom Lane
- Regression test on FBSD 3.3 &am... Mathijs Brands
- Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3... Tom Lane
- Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: Regression test on FBSD 3.3... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] MIPS test-and-set Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] MIPS test-and-set Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for plat... Mathijs Brands
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Ryan Kirkpatrick
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Adriaan Joubert
- [HACKERS] Call for platforms Giles Lean
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Giles Lean
