Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 20:02 31/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Perhaps we should just hack that code >> to not suppress inherited attrs when they have default values and/or >> NOT NULL that's not in the parent. > That's what I meant; can we easily do the 'not in the parent' part, since > we may have to go up a long hierarchy to find the parent? pg_dump must already contain code to traverse the inheritance hierarchy (I haven't looked to see where). Couldn't we just extend it to believe that it's found a match only if the default value and NOT NULL state match, as well as the column name? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the def... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default ... Christopher Masto
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the def... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default value of an inherited... Oliver Elphick