Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it needs to dump ONLY the overridden settigns, since a change to > the overriding behaviour of a child seems like a bad thing. I was about to say it's not worth the trouble, but I see you already did it ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an inheri... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an i... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an i... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an inheri... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changing the default value of an inheri... Philip Warner