Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > OTOH we may be talking at cross-purposes --- on looking into gram.y > > I see that this syntax is transformed to a call of convert_using(), > > which may mean it has nothing to do with your changes. > > > > > > > > No, I changed convert_using - > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c?r1=1.36&r2=1.37 > > We can revert that if necessary. It will open up a hole, though. Take > your pick - spec compliance or validly coded data.
Is this a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
