Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >> > >>> OTOH we may be talking at cross-purposes --- on looking into gram.y > >>> I see that this syntax is transformed to a call of convert_using(), > >>> which may mean it has nothing to do with your changes. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> No, I changed convert_using - > >> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c?r1=1.36&r2=1.37 > >> > >> We can revert that if necessary. It will open up a hole, though. Take > >> your pick - spec compliance or validly coded data. > >> > > > > Is this a TODO? > > > > No, we're long past this point. We've dropped 'convert ... using' entirely.
The question is whether re-adding it should be a TODO. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
