Hi.
Thanks!
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think it is a permissible range. Thanks!
Most of the remaining discrepancy is because you did not account for the
per-shared-buffer management overhead. The table shows shared_buffers
as costing 8300 bytes each, not 8192.
Oops, I did the misapprehension by the alteration of MB and kB.
This estimates the value secured more correctly.
40*(1800+270*64)= 763200
5*(700+270*64)= 89900
28MB*1024/8*8300= 29747200
64kB/8*8200= 65600
1000*70= 70000
179200*6= 1075200
700kB= 716800
Total :32527900
ipcs-m:32571392
-43492
Does this suit?
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
