On 11/2/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The feature i am talking about is very simple and it won't even add
> > 100 lines of code into the Postgres source code base.
>
> [ splorfff... ] The grammar support alone will cost ten times that.
>
> You should probably reflect on the fact that not one single person
> besides you thinks this is a good idea.
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom,
If you have made this comment, when i requested for the comment, i
would have dropped this idea there itself. :). But please let me know your
comments on why you feel this is useless.
But i guess(I may be wrong), you may be wrong about the grammar support
part.
--
Thanks,
Gokul.
CertoSQL Project,
Allied Solution Group.
(www.alliedgroups.com)
