Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Not to mention there don't seem to be any defined rules. I asked Berkus > and his reply was, "It has always been a little fuzzy". I asked Devrim > and he gave me 5 bullet points that don't quite make sense.
Not sure what Devrim is referring to, but most often in the past Rob (or someone else) has proposed changes to -core which we've said yay or nay to. > Further I think this list is in the wrong place. It is > under /developers which to mean is most intuitive to information "for" > developers not a listing of them. Maybe. Where else would it go? > I think the listing should probably go under about/contributors and > under contributors would be: > > Core <-- this is obvious > Committers <-- this is obvious the only question is it only > committers to the source tree or do we want to give equal billing to > the -www guys (I think yes to equal billing) Actually we've previously agreed (in -core) that we do not want to list committers for various reasons. Yeah, I know the list isn't too hard to figure out, but we don't want to advertise it. > Members (really I think this should be contributors but then it is > duplicative) Why not Hackers? Noone is a 'member' of anything except core or mayber the web/infrastructure team. /D ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
