Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:55:33AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Many of these are nonsensical -- we know this is not a device, nor > > network access. Still there is more than one possibility, and I don't > > know which ones should be really acceptable in this context or not. > > (What's ERROR_FAIL_I24??) SHARING_VIOLATION seems the most likely > > problem; an antivirus perhaps? > > If you have an antivirus running on the system, you really should get rid > of taht long before you start looking at the code...
FWIW I noticed by accident that the latest stable version of a not-competing database system has fixed a related bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=9709 (yes, it only took them two and a half years to fix it). Note that their behavior on finding SHARING_VIOLATION or LOCK_VIOLATION is to retry forever until the error goes away, on the theory that the antivirus/backup software will soon release the file. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre "Someone said that it is at least an order of magnitude more work to do production software than a prototype. I think he is wrong by at least an order of magnitude." (Brian Kernighan) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
