On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:58:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I vote we just decide that GSS isn't going to be supported on protocol > >> V2, and put a suitable error message into the server for that. It > >> doesn't seem to me that this combination is worth the amount of > >> contortions it would require to support. > > > Agreed. The cost is rapidly becoming too high. But we certainly can't > > change the protocol for the stuff that actually does work. > > This problem applies to SSPI too, correct?
Yeah, they work the same way. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
