Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess that is the question. Are we heading for an overwriting storage
>> manager?
> I've never heard that it was given up. So there seems to be
> at least a possibility to introduce it in the future.
Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting
smgr is impractical. We need a more complex space-reuse scheme than
that.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
