Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting >> smgr is impractical. > Impractical ? Oracle does it. Oracle has MVCC? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim