"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > what's your opinion on this? > I saw response only from Alvaro on the -patches list.
I don't understand. The patch only affects configuration and SQL data type code. It doesn't actually store the 64-bit commandid anywhere which would be the actual hard part. Do "phantom" command ids mean this all just works magically? Ie, the limit of 2^32 <cmin,cmax> pairs is still there but as long as you don't have to store more than that many you get to have 2^64 raw ephemeral commandids? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
