On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs writes: >> >> Can we call them "maps" or "metadata maps"? "forks" sounds weird. > > I'm not wedded to "forks", that's just the name that was used in the > only previous example I've seen. Classic Mac had a "resource fork" > and a "data fork" within each file.
Microsoft / NTFS calls them Data Streams: http://www.wikistc.org/wiki/Alternate_data_streams Jochem -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
