On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not wedded to "forks", that's just the name that was used in the > only previous example I've seen. Classic Mac had a "resource fork" > and a "data fork" within each file. > > Don't think I like "maps" though, as (a) that prejudges what the > alternate forks might be used for, and (b) the name fails to be > inclusive of the data fork. Other suggestions anyone?
Shadow? As each err, fork trails each relfilenode? (Or perhaps "shade"). Hints? As something more generic than "map"? Regards, Dawid -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers