Tom Lane escribió: > "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > A text_to_cstring_with_len() or text_to_cstring_limit() might be more > > to the point, and more consistent with the other functions in the > > family. > > Hmm. The thing that's bothering me is that the length is the size > of the *destination*, which is not like cstring_to_text_with_len, > so using a closely similar name might be confusing. Of those two > I'd go with text_to_cstring_limit. Another thought that comes to > mind is > > void text_to_cstring_buffer(const text *src, char *dst, size_t dst_len) text_to_cstring_buffer seems okay. I did wonder for a bit whether it should be void text_to_cstring_buffer(const text *src, char *buf, size_t buf_len) but then the src/dst pair seems better than src/buf. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
