Folks, I'd like to take a whack at making set-returning functions returning SETOF RECORD a little more fun to use. Let's imagine that we have a table foo and a function returning SETOF RECORD that can return foos. The call might look something like:
SELECT a, b, c FROM f(ROW OF foo) WHERE ...; This would make it much easier and less error-prone to use SETOF RECORD. Would others like to see such a feature? If so, what pieces of the code would I be touching for the first patch? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers