Hello maybe I don't understand well your idea. There exist simple syntax - table function
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-02/msg00341.php and it is standard regards Pavel Stehule On 30/03/2008, David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I'd like to take a whack at making set-returning functions returning > SETOF RECORD a little more fun to use. Let's imagine that we have a > table foo and a function returning SETOF RECORD that can return foos. > The call might look something like: > > SELECT a, b, c > FROM f(ROW OF foo) > WHERE ...; > > This would make it much easier and less error-prone to use SETOF > RECORD. > > Would others like to see such a feature? > > If so, what pieces of the code would I be touching for the first > patch? > > Cheers, > David. > -- > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ > Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter > Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Remember to vote! > Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
