On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:39:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:05:10AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so > >> wide so as to be almost useless by now ... > >> > >> I think this is mostly caused by the "args" column getting too > >> wide. Can we remove the OUT params from it? > > > Not a great idea. > > Yeah, you'd certainly have to provide them somewhere, and so this > would just amount to splitting one column into two.
How about splitting them up with newlines instead of (or in addition to) commas? > >> BTW what happened to the idea of displaying only user functions > >> by default? > > IIRC it was more-or-less agreed to that the 'S' modifier ought to > work uniformly for all object types the way it does now for tables, > but there is no patch in the queue. OK, since I did the whining, I get to prepare a patch. I'll see how far I can get today. :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
