Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe > > limit it to \df+? > > Huh? \df+ has displayed volatility for a long time, and I don't recall > any great demand to move it into \df.
Hmm, right. Maybe the problem I have is that we made \df+ so wide so as to be almost useless by now ... I think this is mostly caused by the "args" column getting too wide. Can we remove the OUT params from it? BTW what happened to the idea of displaying only user functions by default? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
